1
During the runIt's 09:52. Started 09:00. Standard is 45 minutes.
Seven minutes over and nobody told you. The window to act already closed.
Live Operator Visibility During Changeovers
Your changeover is already running long. You'll find out when it's over.
Operators, maintenance, QA — sequenced against a clock the whole schedule depends on. Most plants run that window on paper and gut feel. Problems surface after the fact.
A live shared task board for the shift — and a real-time view of where things stand, which role is delayed, and by how much. Before the moment passes.
What most changeovers actually look like
A paper sheet, a folder, or a verbal handoff. Roles work their steps. The supervisor walks the line or waits for a call. Total time lands on a whiteboard or spreadsheet.
If it ran long: "Does anyone know what happened?" Sometimes there's an answer. Next week looks the same — nothing was captured at step level.
The problem isn't effort. It's resolution.
What you have vs. what you need
You have
Total run time
You're missing
Time per task
You have
Role on the line
You're missing
Which role caused the delay
You have
A pattern you suspect
You're missing
Data to confirm and act on it
The cost isn't one moment. It compounds.
Blind spots hit during the run, after it, and week over week — each with a different cost.
2
After the run61 minutes finished. Standard is 45.
You know you're over. Not which step, which role, or if it happened before. Debrief is memory — nothing changes.
3
Week over weekShift A averages 19 min. Shift B averages 41.
22 minutes lost every Shift B changeover. Without step-level data, you can't show the director where — so the gap stays.
While you're waiting for someone to walk over, it's already flagged.
When a changeover starts, a shared board opens for the shift. Each task shows its owner role and updates live. Floor teams drop the paper sheet; supervisors drop the walk-the-line check. Over standard? Flagged the moment it diverges.
Standards problem or execution problem?
Role-level timestamps answer it from data, not interviews. Maintenance long across every shift → standard is underspecified. Only Shift B → different problem. You need attribution to tell them apart.
Live changeover board
Line 3 · SKU-A100 → SKU-B200 · Started 09:02
Belt clean
Operator
09:02 → 09:14
Temp → 220 °C
Operator
09:14 → 09:24
Mould swap #42 → #78
Maintenance
18 min ⚠ +8 min
Standard: 10 min Elapsed: 18 min
Pressure to 3.5 bar
Operator
Waiting
First-piece QC check
2 of 5 complete 1 step delayed · supervisor alerted
After the run: a timeline, not a debrief.
Every step was timestamped and role-attributed during the run. You review a Gantt — which task ran long, who owned it, vs. standard and prior runs — instead of reconstructing from memory.
"Mould swap: 18 min vs 10 — Maintenance long on 6 of last 8." Different conversation than "does anyone know why we ran long?"
Per-run timelines feed post-run analytics — multi-run trends across shifts, lines, and changeover types.
After your first run
Ready to run your first tracked changeover?
Configure one line, run one changeover. Leave with a task timeline and role-level attribution most plants never get.
-
Timestamped sign-off
Audit-ready from run one
-
Gantt of every task
See where time was lost
-
A repeatable standard
Not tied to who showed up
7-day free trial · Self-serve · No IT project